Understanding the difference between SIP and traditional saving methods

When it comes to savings and investments, understanding the various approaches is important for making informed decisions. Among the many popular methods of investment is the Systematic Investment Plan (SIP), which is known for its unique benefits. Traditional saving methods, on the other hand, have been the foundation of personal finance for generations. Some of the traditional saving methods include savings accounts, fixed deposits, and recurring deposits, each characterised by their simplicity and stability.

Let’s take a look at some of the key features of SIP vs. traditional investments.

• Table of contents

1. Systematic Investment Plan (SIP)
2. Traditional saving methods
3. SIP vs. Traditional saving methods
4. FAQ

Systematic Investment Plan (SIP)

An SIP is a method of investing in mutual funds. It allows investors to invest a fixed amount regularly, typically monthly or quarterly, into a chosen mutual fund scheme. SIPs offer a disciplined approach to investing, and the habit of investing regularly can help build a significant corpus over time. The feature of rupee cost averaging in SIPs means that more units are purchased when prices are low and fewer units when prices are high, which averages out the cost of investment and can potentially lead to better returns in fluctuating markets.

Moreover, SIPs offer the flexibility to start with a small amount, making them accessible to a wide range of investors. They also allow investors to increase their investment amount as their income grows. This aspect, combined with the potential for higher returns – thanks to the compounding effect – makes SIPs an attractive option for young investors and those looking to build a substantial retirement fund.

Additionally, certain SIPs in Equity Linked Saving Schemes (ELSS) also offer tax benefits under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act, which is an added advantage over most traditional saving methods.

Traditional saving methods

Traditional saving methods, such as savings accounts, fixed deposits (FDs), and recurring deposits (RDs), are known for their stability and predictability of returns. While savings accounts also offer liquidity and ease of access, FDs and RDs provide fixed returns over a predetermined period.

SIP vs. Traditional saving methods

Let us compare the two types of saving methods from the perspective of growth, diversification, risk, liquidity, and suitability for investors.

Potential for growth

SIPs are linked to the stock market, which is why they offer a higher potential for growth compared to traditional saving options. When the stock market is volatile, SIPs benefit from the concept of rupee cost averaging, which can potentially lead to higher returns in the long run. In contrast, traditional saving methods offer fixed and predictable returns but generally at lower rates. This makes them less suitable for long-term wealth creation due to the erosive effect of inflation, but ideal for short-term savings and emergency funds.

Diversification

SIP in mutual funds inherently offer diversification as they invest in a variety of stocks or bonds, depending on the fund’s objective. This reduces the risk compared to investing in a single stock or bond. In contrast, traditional saving methods do not provide diversification as they are not linked to the stock market.

Risk factor

While SIPs are subject to market risks, choosing a fund with a good track record and investing over a longer period can mitigate some of these risks. Additionally, there are various types of mutual funds, including debt and hybrid funds, which offer different levels of risk. However, traditional saving methods are considered safer as they are not subject to market fluctuations. They are more stable but offer limited growth potential.

Liquidity

SIPs offer moderate liquidity. Investors can withdraw their investment, but it might be subject to exit loads or market conditions depending on the type of fund invested in. Traditional saving methods like savings accounts offer high liquidity, whereas fixed and recurring deposits have a fixed tenure, making them less liquid.

Suitability for investors

SIPs are suitable for investors looking to build wealth over a long period, are comfortable with some level of risk, and wish to benefit from the growth potential of the stock market. Traditional saving methods are ideal for conservative investors who prefer stability and guaranteed returns, even if they are lower.

Conclusion

While traditional saving methods offer safety and predictability, SIPs provide a dynamic and potentially more rewarding path to wealth creation. Understanding the features and benefits of each type of investment method can help investors make choices that align with their financial goals and risk appetite.

FAQs:

Is a SIP better than a traditional saving method?
The answer varies based on your financial goals and risk tolerance. SIPs offer higher growth potential but with increased risk, while traditional methods are safer but with limited growth potential.

Can I lose money in a SIP?
Yes, because SIPs invest in the stock market, there is a risk of loss, especially in the short term. However, investing over a long period can potentially mitigate this risk.

Are traditional saving methods completely risk-free?
While they are considered relatively stable, factors like inflation can affect the real value of the returns from traditional saving methods.

Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully.
This document should not be treated as endorsement of the views/opinions or as investment advice. This document should not be construed as a research report or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. This document is for information purpose only and should not be construed as a promise on minimum returns or safeguard of capital. This document alone is not sufficient and should not be used for the development or implementation of an investment strategy. The recipient should note and understand that the information provided above may not contain all the material aspects relevant for making an investment decision. Investors are advised to consult their own investment advisor before making any investment decision in light of their risk appetite, investment goals and horizon. This information is subject to change without any prior notice.