Lumpsum vs STP: what is a better investment strategy?
When it comes to investing, not only are there many avenues available, but also many ways to invest. Common modes of investment include lumpsum, Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) and Systematic Transfer Plan (STP). Knowing each of these can help you choose the strategy that would be most suited for your needs.
In this article, we look at the difference between lumpsum and STP to guide you on the investment mode that could be suitable for you.
- Table of contents
- Understanding lumpsum
- Understanding STP
- Differences between lumpsum and STP
- Factors to consider when choosing STP and lumpsum
- Lumpsum vs STP - Which is more suitable?
Understanding lumpsum
Lumpsum investment involves putting in a large amount of money in one go. One advantage of lumpsum is that your money starts working for you immediately.
Lumpsum investing harnesses the power of compounding to its fullest potential. This is because potential returns are generated on the entire principal amount right from the beginning. These returns, when reinvested, have the potential to earn further returns, which leads to a compounding effect, as and when the market goes up. Over time, compounding can lead your investments to grow at an accelerated rate and exponentially. You can make use of a compound interest calculator to get an idea of compounding can help your wealth grow over time.
This means that when the market is performing well, your return potential is optimized. However, if the market goes down, you can also face significant losses.
Thus, lumpsum investing may be suitable for those who have a large amount to invest and can handle market fluctuations.
Understanding STP
STP stands for Systematic Transfer Plan. It involves transferring funds systematically from one mutual fund scheme to another within the same asset management company (AMC). These transfers can occur at predefined intervals, typically monthly or quarterly.
The main idea behind STP is to park money in a debt fund or liquid fund initially and then transfer it into an equity fund over time.
This systematic approach can help investors to tap into the potential growth of equity markets while reducing the exposure to market volatility through rupee cost averaging. By investing a fixed amount regardless of market conditions, you end up purchasing more mutual fund units when the Net Asset Value is low, and fewer when it is high. Over time this strategy typically reduces your per-unit cost, thereby enhancing return potential.
STP is therefore useful for investors who want to manage market volatility and mitigate risk by gradually transferring their investments from a less risky asset (such as a debt fund) to a riskier one (such as equities). It is also useful for investors who want to diversify their investments over time. Some investors also choose to transfer only the gains from their debt investments into equity, while leaving their initial capital in a relatively low-risk avenue.
Differences between lumpsum and STP
| Parameter | Lumpsum Investment | Systematic Transfer Plan (STP) |
|---|---|---|
| Market timing | Entire amount isinvested at once, exposed to current market conditions immediately. | staggered over time, averaging out market ups and downs through rupee cost |
| Volatility | Faces full impact of market volatility on the entire invested amount. | Reduces volatility impact through systematic rupee cost averaging and gradual investment. |
| Asset allocation | The entire amount is allocated to the target asset class – such as equity – at one go. | Typically starts in debt funds and gradually transfers to equity over time. |
| Flexibility | Less flexible once | Investors can adjust transfer amounts based on market conditions. |
| Investment | Requires investor discipline to stay invested during downturns. | Promotes discipline through regular, systematic transfers. |
| Ideal market scenario | Can offer relatively better return potential if invested during market lows. | May works in moderately volatile or sideways markets. |
| Wealth creation | Enables full compounding potential from the start. | May limit upside during bull runs due to gradual equity exposure. |
Factors to consider when choosing STP and lumpsum
When choosing between lumpsum and STP, consider the following factors:
- Market conditions: If the market is low, a lumpsum investment can be beneficial as you can buy more units at a lower price. However, if the market is uncertain, STP can help manage risks.
- Risk tolerance: If you can handle high risks, lumpsum might be suitable. But if you prefer to minimize risks, STP is a better option.
- Financial goals: Your financial goals also determine the most suitable or preferred strategy.
Lumpsum vs STP - Which is more suitable?
A lumpsum investment may be suitable when markets are down and the investor has a high risk appetite, while an STP may suit those seeking a more measured entry into equities with reduced volatility exposure. The choice depends on financial goals, market outlook, and investment discipline.
Lumpsum investment:
- May be suitable for investors with high risk tolerance and a long-term horizon, especially when market valuations are relatively reasonable.
- Offers the potential to capture full market upswings early, but also exposes investors to higher short-term volatility.
- Requires careful timing and strong conviction about market entry.
Systematic Transfer Plan (STP):
- Helps average out the purchase cost through market fluctuations, reducing the impact of volatility.
- Encourages disciplined investing and may be suitable for investors who prefer gradual equity exposure.
- Does not guarantee higher returns but helps manage timing-related risks.
Conclusion
STP involves gradual investment, reducing risk, while lumpsum is a one-time investment, suitable for high-risk tolerance. STP averages out market fluctuations, whereas lumpsum has the potential to capture market gains immediately and fully benefit from the power of compounding on potential returns. The choice between them depends on your risk tolerance, market conditions, and financial goals. It is always recommended that you consult a financial advisor before making major investment decisions. You can also use an STP calculator and a lumpsum calculator to assess the difference in the growth potential of an STP and lumpsum investment.
FAQs
What is the minimum investment requirement for lumpsum and STP?
The minimum investment for lumpsum or STP varies based on the fund but starts at around Rs. 500 in several schemes.
How do lumpsum and STP differ in terms of risk management?
Lumpsum carries higher risk as it involves investing a large amount at once, subject to market fluctuations. STP reduces risk by spreading investments over time, averaging out market volatility. Moreover, STP investments enable investors to leave a portion of their funds in a relatively low-risk avenue such as debt mutual funds.
Can I switch between lumpsum and STP easily?
You can start an STP in a scheme that you had earlier made a lumpsum investment in. This may involve a quick and easy application process.
Are there any tax implications associated with lumpsum and STP?
In equity funds, gains on units redeemed within 12 months are considered short-term capital gains and taxed at 20%, while gains on units held for more than 12 months qualify as long-term capital gains. Long-term gains up to ₹1.25 lakh in a financial year are exempt from tax, and any amount above this is taxed at 12.5%. In debt-oriented funds, capital gains are taxed according to the investor’s income tax slab, regardless of the holding period. These rates are base rates and do not include cess or surcharge, and tax rules may change, so it’s advisable to stay updated.
What types of assets can I invest in using lumpsum and STP?
You can invest in various assets like mutual funds, stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments using both lumpsum and STP. The choice of assets depends on your financial goals and risk tolerance.
Is lumpsum investing riskier than STP?
Lumpsum investing may carry higher risk than a Systematic Transfer Plan (STP) since the entire amount is exposed to market fluctuations at once. In contrast, STP spreads investments over time, potentially reducing volatility impact. However, both approaches are subject to market risks, and outcomes depend on timing and market conditions.
Which strategy performs better during a bull market?
During a strong bull market, lumpsum investments may deliver higher potential returns because the full amount participates in the rally from the start. STP, though relatively steadier, may yield lower returns as funds enter the market gradually. Yet, neither approach guarantees performance, as markets remain unpredictable.
How does Rupee Cost Averaging work in STP?
Rupee cost averaging in STP means investing fixed amounts periodically, irrespective of market levels. This approach may help investors purchase more units when prices fall and fewer when prices rise, potentially lowering the average cost per unit over time. However, it doesn’t eliminate market or timing risks.
Can I customize my STP plans (frequency and amount)?
Yes, investors can choose STP frequency, such as daily, weekly, or monthly, and the transfer amount, depending on fund options provided by the AMC. Customization allows flexibility, but investors should review their cash flow, financial goals, and market conditions before setting or modifying their STP structure.
How long should I stay invested in an STP to see benefits?
STPs may require at least a few market cycles, often a year or more, for rupee cost averaging to show meaningful impact. Staying invested over the long term may help smooth short-term volatility, though returns remain linked to market performance and cannot be assured.
What happens if the market crashes after a lumpsum investment?
If the market declines after a lumpsum investment, the portfolio’s value may temporarily fall. Historically, markets have tended to recover over time, but duration and extent vary. Investors should align their lumpsum exposure with long-term goals and risk appetite to manage volatility effectively.
Can STP be used for portfolio rebalancing?
Yes, STP may help in portfolio rebalancing by gradually shifting funds from one asset category to another—such as from debt to equity or vice versa. This systematic transfer approach may help maintain asset allocation goals while reducing timing risk associated with sudden portfolio adjustments.
Related Searches:
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully.
This document should not be treated as endorsement of the views/opinions or as investment advice. This document should not be construed as a research report or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. This document is for information purpose only and should not be construed as a promise on minimum returns or safeguard of capital. This document alone is not sufficient and should not be used for the development or implementation of an investment strategy. The recipient should note and understand that the information provided above may not contain all the material aspects relevant for making an investment decision. Investors are advised to consult their own investment advisor before making any investment decision in light of their risk appetite, investment goals and horizon. This information is subject to change without any prior notice.
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully.
This document should not be treated as endorsement of the views/opinions or as investment advice. This document should not be construed as a research report or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. This document is for information purpose only and should not be construed as a promise on minimum returns or safeguard of capital. This document alone is not sufficient and should not be used for the development or implementation of an investment strategy. The recipient should note and understand that the information provided above may not contain all the material aspects relevant for making an investment decision. Investors are advised to consult their own investment advisor before making any investment decision in light of their risk appetite, investment goals and horizon. This information is subject to change without any prior notice.
The content herein has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable. However, Bajaj Finserv Asset Management Ltd. does not guarantee the accuracy of such information, assure its completeness or warrant such information will not be changed. The tax information (if any) in this article is based on prevailing laws at the time of publishing the article and is subject to change. Please consult a tax professional or refer to the latest regulations for up-to-date information.